DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681657·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 3 months agoOFF CALENDAR

AYOUB FAMILY LLC VS. ALEXANDER G. MAXA ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Hearing date
May 29, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAYOUB FAMILY LLC
DefendantALEXANDER G. MAXA
DefendantWhite

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 29, 2026. Line 17. DEFENDANT ALEXANDER MAXA MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is OFF CALENDAR. No proof of service of the moving papers on Defendant White. All papers must be served on all parties that have appeared in the action. This matter was previously continued from May 15, 2026 at Defendant Maxa's request, with express instructions to Defendant Maxa to serve all moving papers to all parties appearing in the action and to file a notice of continued hearing no later than close of the business day on May 19, 2026.

No notice of continued hearing or proof of service was filed. =(501/DWH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share