DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV0681·eldorado·Civil·Demurrer / Sealed Documents
Hearing 19 days agoMOOT / DENIED

PETER ELLIS VS. MATTHEW JOHNSON

Demurrer; Motion for Court Sealed Documents for Court Transcripts

Hearing date
Jul 31, 2026
Department
9
Judge
Prevailing
Mixed
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPeter Ellis
DefendantMatthew Johnson

Ruling

July 31, 2026 Dept. 9 Civil Tentative Rulings

8. 26CV0681 PETER ELLIS VS. MATTHEW JOHNSON DEMURRER AND MOTION FOR COURT SEALED DOCUMENTS FOR COURT TRANSCRIPTS

Before the Court are two motions: 1) Demurrer filed by Defendants; and 2) Motion for Court Sealed Documents for Court Transcripts filed by Plaintiff.

DEMURRER

On February 20, 2026, Plaintiff filed a Complaint. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on April 27, 2026. The Proof of Service of Summons indicates that the Summons and First Amended Complaint were served by mail on May 2, 2026. However, Plaintiff did not indicate that two copies of the Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt and a postagepaid return envelope addressed to him were included, nor did he attach the completed Notice and Acknowledgement of Receipt, rendering service defective.

On May 20, 2026, Defendants filed a Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Complaint filed on February 20, 2026. As Plaintiff has filed a First Amended Complaint, Defendant’s demurrer to Plaintiff’s Complaint is moot.

MOTION FOR COURT SEALED DOCUMENTS

On June 18, 2026, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Court Sealed Documents for Court Transcripts. Plaintiff is requesting an order for the transcripts from the motion held on October 13, 2025, in department 2. No proof of service was filed. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is denied.

TENTATIVE RULING #8: DEFENDANTS’ DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT IS RENDERED MOOT. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR COURT SEALED DOCUMENTS FOR COURT TRANSCRIPTS IS DENIED.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY TELEPHONE TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6551 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999).

NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; EL DORADO COUNTY LOCAL RULE 8.05.07. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SAID NOTICE MUST BE FILED PRIOR TO OR AT THE HEARING.

LONG CAUSE HEARINGS MUST BE REQUESTED BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED AND THE PARTIES ARE TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH THREE MUTUALLY

July 31, 2026 Dept. 9 Civil Tentative Rulings

AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. LONG CAUSE ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTS WILL BE SET FOR HEARING ON ONE OF THE THREE MUTUALLY AGREEABLE DATES ON FRIDAY AFTERNOONS AT 2:30 P.M. THE COURT WILL ADVISE THE PARTIES OF THE LONG CAUSE HEARING DATE AND TIME BY 5:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. PARTIES MAY PERSONALLY APPEAR AT THE HEARING.

17

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share