Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order To Restrict Public Access To The Record Per California Rule Of Court 2.550(D)
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25622760 - August 11, 2025 Hearing date: August 11, 2025 Case number: CGC25622760 Case title: PAUL D. LAPACHET ET AL VS. LARON SANDERS ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25622760 | Case Title: | | PAUL D. LAPACHET ET AL VS. LARON SANDERS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-11 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order To Restrict Public Access To The Record Per California Rule Of Court 2.550(D) | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 11, 2025, line 1.
Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Restrict Public Access to the Record is DENIED. First, the motion is premature because Defendant need not vacate the unit until December 2025. Plaintiff warns of the consequences of an ejectment judgment, yet there is no judgment in this case. Second, Plaintiff does not explain how it is narrowly tailored to seal the entire record of a case. Finally, the Court cannot make the required factual findings under CRC 2.550 because the only declaration is from counsel, who does not lay the foundation for his assertions regarding tenant screenings, background checks, Defendant's economic opportunities, and more. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”