Clayton Lisy v. Emeline Easton Herreid, et al.

Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court

Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Department 508 CLAYTON LISY, individually and professionally known as Clayton Thomas and "Reverse Pathogen," Plaintiff, vs. EMELINE EASTON HERREID, et al., Defendants. | Case No.: |

| Hearing Date: | August 18, 2026 | Hearing Time: | 8:30 a.m. 1:30 p.m. | ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS KENDALL CREEDON AND HARD LAUNCH PARTNER GROUP, LLC'S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 425.16 DEFENDANT EMELINE EASTON HERREID P/K/A EMELINE'S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE PURSUANT TO ANTI-SLAPP STATUTE (C.C.P. Sec. 425.16) | The special motion to strike (anti-SLAPP) brought by Defendants Kendall Creedon and Hard Launch Partner Group, LLC (jointly, " Defendants ") against Plaintiff Clayton Lisy ("Plaintiff") is continued as set forth below. The special motion to strike (anti-SLAPP) brought by Defendant Emeline Easton Herreid p/k/a Emeline (" Herreid ") against Plaintiff is also continued as set forth below.

In Defendants' anti-SLAPP motion, they interposed 23 evidentiary objections, and Plaintiff interposed 8 evidentiary objections, for a total of 31 evidentiary objections. In Herreid's anti-SLAPP motion, Herreid interposed 13 evidentiary objections, and Plaintiff interposed 11 evidentiary objections, for a total of 24 evidentiary objections.

Due to the voluminous number of objections, the hearing on the motions will be continued to a date that will be set at the Hearing on Objections discussed below. The Court orders the parties to meet and confer by telephone or in person in a serious and good faith effort to resolve and eliminate the objections for their respective motions. The only objections that should remain are those that pertain to material evidence regarding material issues. Keeping the rules of evidence in mind, the parties should be able to reduce the objections to just a few.

If any material objections remain unresolved, the parties are to set them forth in a joint statement with the text, the objection, and the argument of each side in favor of their respective positions regarding the remaining material objections, along with a space for a ruling. The joint statement must be filed on or before _______ with a courtesy copy delivered to Department 508. The Court will review any remaining objections with the parties at a hearing on _______________, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. (the "Hearing on Objections"). The date for the hearing on the motion will be set at the Hearing on Objections.

If necessary, based upon the resolutions reached during the meet and confer process and/or at the Hearing on Objections, the parties may respectively file and serve revised briefing and evidence. The revised evidence may eliminate objectionable material; however, no new evidence or new argument is to be submitted unless it is as a result of compromises reached during the meet and confer process. In the event that revised briefing and evidence are necessary, the Court will discuss with the parties a briefing schedule for the revised briefing at the Hearing on Objections.

Defendants are ordered to give notice of this Order. DATED: August 18, 2026 ________________________________ Hon. Teresa A. Beaudet Judge, Los Angeles Superior Court | Home -->)" -->