Defendant’s Motion to Strike - Anti SLAPP
evidence of real-world obstacles than this quotation from Gentry and the fact that Driver Partners were required to agree to arbitration as a condition of work, published authority holds this showing is sufficient to satisfy a plaintiff’s burden on the fourth factor. (See Garrido v. Air Liquide Industrial U.S. LP (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 833, 846-847.) Accordingly, even if the Court hadn’t found the arbitration agreement unconscionable and thus unenforceable, it would still invalidate the class waiver under Gentry. V.
Conclusion
Because the arbitration agreement is both procedurally and substantively unconscionable, Defendant’s motion is denied. Moreover, even if the agreement were otherwise enforceable, the class action waiver is invalid under Gentry. 9 PELORUS FUND REIT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company vs. ARGENT INSTITUTIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Successor in interest to Acquiom Agency Services LLC, a Florida corporartion
2026-01563653
Defendant’s Motion to Strike - Anti SLAPP Defendant’s Motion to Strike - Anti SLAPP CONTINUED TO 8/4/2026 10 Albert vs. Tyler Technologies, Inc.
2025-01462434
Defendant’s Demurrer to Amended Complaint Defendant’s Demurrer to Amended Complaint Defendant’s Motion to Strike - Anti SLAPP Defendant’s Motion for Beth Petronion’s to Appear Pro Hac Vice CONTINUED TO 9/4/2026
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”