DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23STCV17401·la·Civil·Employment
Hearing in 1 dayThe Motion is denied.

Sullivan v. Los Angeles Community College District, et al.

Motion to Quash Subpoena

Hearing date
Aug 20, 2026
Department
310
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffKathleen Sullivan
DefendantLos Angeles Community College District

Ruling

Case No.: 23STCV17401 Matter: Motion to Quash Subpoena Moving Party: Plaintiff Kathleen Sullivan Responding Party: Defendant Los Angeles Community College District Notice: OK Ruling: The Motion is denied. Moving party to give notice. The Court encourages all parties to appear remotely via LA CourtConnect. If submitting on the Court's tentative ruling, please follow the instructions provided above. This is an employment action in which Plaintiff Kathleen Sullivan asserts seven causes of action pursuant to the FEHA. Plaintiff sought to quash the deposition subpoena as to Marie Rains, but apparently now seeks to withdraw the Motion. Defendant LACCD continues to seek sanctions. The Court has considered the matter and declines to award sanctions. The Motion is otherwise withdrawn or denied. Moving party to give notice.

Judge Kevin C. Brazile Department 310 Hearing Date: August 20, 2026 Case Name: Collect Access LLC v. JAH Freight LLC, et al.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share