DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0055499·placer·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing 26 days agoGRANTED in part

MILES, HEATHER v. YASSO, JAMES

Plaintiff Heather Miles’ Motion to Quash or Modify Deposition Subpoena, Protective Order, and Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 24, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMILES, HEATHER
DefendantYASSO, JAMES

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FRIDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 1 COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR JULY 24, 2026 AT 8:30 A.M.

13. S-CV-0055499 MILES, HEATHER v. YASSO, JAMES

Plaintiff Heather Miles’ Motion to Quash or Modify Deposition Subpoena, Protective Order, and Sanctions

The motion is granted in part.

The request to quash the deposition subpoenas is denied.

A protective order is entered as to all seven deposition subpoenas issued on May 8, 2026 to plaintiff’s medical service providers limiting production to fall under the following parameters:

• Disclosure of records is limited to five years preceding the subject collision, i.e. from 2018 and ongoing; • All productions shall be subject to a first-look agreement where all documents will first be produced to plaintiff’s counsel to evaluate and prepare a privilege log of the documents to be withheld and/or redacted before providing the remaining, redacted documents to defendant’s counsel along with the privilege log. Plaintiff will have 30 days from receipt of the documents to complete review and provide the redacted documents and privilege log to defendant’s counsel;

The request for sanctions is denied at this time.

///

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 1 Friday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share