DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0049385·placer·Civil·Lemon Law
Hearing 26 days agoThe appearances of the parties are required for both hearings.

MUNOZ, JOSE v. FORD MOTOR CO

Defendants Ford Motor Company and Future Ford Lincoln of Roseville’s Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Summary Adjudication; Defendant Ford Motor Company’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Deposition and Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 24, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMUNOZ, JOSE
DefendantFORD MOTOR CO
DefendantFUTURE FORD LINCOLN OF ROSEVILLE

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FRIDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 1 COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR JULY 24, 2026 AT 8:30 A.M.

7. S-CV-0049385 MUNOZ, JOSE v. FORD MOTOR CO

NOTE: If oral argument is requested in this case, it shall be heard on JULY 24, 2026 AT 1:00 P.M. in DEPARTMENT 1.

Defendants Ford Motor Company and Future Ford Lincoln of Roseville’s Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Summary Adjudication and Defendant Ford Motor Company’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Deposition and Sanctions

The appearances of the parties are required for both hearings.

///

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 1 Friday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share