DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVRI2602281·riverside·Civil·Civil
Hearing 4 days agoGRANTED

BLAYLOCK vs ENGLEMAN

MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Aug 14, 2026
Department
2
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBlaylock
DefendantEngleman

Ruling

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME LUA vs PLATINUM SALES CVRI2601725 MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT AND SERVICES, INC. Tentative Ruling:

The hearing on the demurrer and motion to strike is continued to a date agreed upon by the Court and parties.

4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME BLAYLOCK vs MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF

ENGLEMAN SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Tentative Ruling:

No opposition filed. Motion granted. Prevailing party to prepare order.

5. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HARB VS COUNTY OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY CVRI2203266 RIVERSIDE JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling:

Summary of Ruling: The Court denies the motion. The Court grants the request for judicial notice. The Court overrules the evidentiary objections.

Factual / Procedural Context

This is a wrongful death case. On August 4, 2024, Plaintiffs Ali Harb, Ibrahim Harb and Lama Harb, individually and as the successors-in-interest of Decedent Ferial Harb (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint against Defendants City of Riverside (the “City”), County of Riverside (the “County”), State of California, Brian Gene Bozarth, III (“Brian”), and Melissa Bozarth (“Melissa”) (together “Defendants”) asserting causes of action for: (1) Dangerous Condition of Public Property; (2) Negligence; (3) Wrongful Death; and (4) Recovery under C.C.P. § 377.34.1 In the Complaint, Plaintiffs allege that on January 19, 2022, Decedent was walking near the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Victoria Avenue in the Riverside (the “Intersection”) when she was struck by a vehicle driven by Brian, who owned the vehicle with Melissa. (Complaint at ¶ 12.)

Decedent sustained fatal injuries as a result of the collision. (Ibid.) Brian was inattentive to his driving,

1 The State of California was dismissed on September 14, 2022 and the County of Riverside was

dismissed on April 11, 2023.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share