RANDLE vs TAYLOR, et al.

26CV186153: RANDLE vs TAYLOR, et al. 07/16/2026 Hearing on Motion to Quash Service of Summons; filed by Jamaal Taylor (Defendant) CRS# 245043724300 in Department 511

Tentative Ruling - 07/14/2026 Lupe Garcia

The Motion to Quash Service of Summons filed by Jamaal Taylor on 06/22/2026 is Denied.

NOTICE: All attorneys and unrepresented parties who contest the tentative ruling and request an opportunity to present their arguments at the hearing must notify all other parties of their intention to appear by telephone or in person no later than the day before the hearing, by 4:00 p.m. PT. Parties and attorneys must also formally indicate their objection on eCourt and by sending an email message to the Department 511 clerk at Dept511@alameda.courts.ca.gov. The parties and attorneys must clearly indicate in their email messages the name of the case and the case number. The tentative ruling will become the ruling of the Court if the Court has not directed oral argument by its tentative ruling and notice of a party’s intent to appear is not received by the deadline. See California Rule of Court 3.1308(a)(1) and Alameda County Superior Court Local Rule 3.30(d).

The motion of Specially Appearing Defendant Jamaal Taylor (“Defendant”) to quash service of summons by Plaintiff Walter R. Randle, pursuant to CCP §§ 418.10(a)(1) and 1167.4(a), is DENIED.

Defendant’s motion is procedurally invalid because he did not file proof of service of the motion papers on Plaintiff’s attorney. See CCP 1013a and §§ 1167.4(a). Defendant was required to file proof of service no later than five court days before the hearing. See Rule of Court 3.1300(c).

The Court will prepare the order. The court clerk will deliver a copy of the order to the parties. Plaintiff Randle shall file and serve the notice of entry of order no later than July 22, 2026.