DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25FL0020·eldorado·Civil·Child Custody and Visitation
Hearing about 2 months agoTHE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR FOR THE HEARING.

JOSH ANDERSON V. YU CHEN CHANG

Request for Order (RFO) seeking custody and visitation orders

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJosh Anderson
DefendantYu Chen Chang

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 July 2, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.

1. JOSH ANDERSON V. YU CHEN CHANG 25FL0020

On April 7, 2026, Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) seeking custody and visitation orders. This matter was originally filed and denied on an ex parte basis. All required documents were served by mail on April 23rd, because this is a post-judgment request, Petitioner also filed a Declaration Regarding Address Verification.

On April 14, 2026, Respondent also filed an RFO seeking custody and visitation orders. The requests were originally filed ex parte and the court ordered the minors to be immediately returned to the state of California. All other requests were denied on an ex parte basis. There is no Proof of Service for the RFO therefore, this matter is dropped from calendar.

A Child Custody Recommending Counseling (CCRC) appointment was scheduled to take place on May 4, 2026, however neither party appeared at the appointment. As such, a memorandum of no appearance was prepared and filed with the court. The court does not have a Certificate of Mailing for this document so it does not appear that it was sent to the parties.

Petitioner filed and served updating declaration on June 22nd.

It is unclear to the court if the parties were aware of the scheduled CCRC appointment. The parties are ordered to appear for the hearing.

TENTATIVE RULING #1: THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR FOR THE HEARING.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share