DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23FL0665·eldorado·Civil·Emergency Child Custody
Hearing about 2 months agoPARTIES ORDERED TO APPEAR.

RYAN RICHARDS V. JENNIFER RICHARDS

Ex parte application for emergency custody

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Ex Parte Application rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRyan Richards
DefendantJennifer Richards

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 July 2, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.

17. RYAN RICHARDS V. JENNIFER RICHARDS 23FL0665

Petitioner filed an ex parte application for emergency custody orders on May 18, 2026. The court granted the request on May 19, 2026, granting Petitioner temporary sole legal and physical custody of the minors. The court set an emergency Child Custody Recommending Counseling (CCRC) appointment for June 2, 2026 and a review hearing on July 2, 2026. Respondent was mail served on May 27, 2026. This is a post-judgement request for modification, and as such, Family Code section 215 applies. Petitioner has not provided address verification in accordance with Family Code section 215.

Only Petitioner appeared at the CCRC appointment. A single parent report was filed with the court on June 2, 2026. Copies were mailed to the parties on June 3, 2026.

Petitioner filed a Supplemental Declaration on June 22, 2026. Respondent was mail served on June 22, 2026. Petitioner subsequently filed a corrected Exhibit 1 to the Supplemental Declaration on June 25, 2026. It was served on June 25, 2026.

The court orders parties to appear for the hearing.

TENTATIVE RULING #17: PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR FOR THE HEARING.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share