DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PFL20200775·eldorado·Civil·Contempt
Hearing 3 months agoAppearance required

ASHLEY SAMADANI V. ANTHONY SAMADANI

Order to Show Cause and Affidavit for Contempt (OSC)

Hearing date
Jun 4, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerAshley Samadani
RespondentAnthony Samadani

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 June 4, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.

8. ASHLEY SAMADANI V. ANTHONY SAMADANI PFL20200775

Petitioner filed an Order to Show Cause and Affidavit for Contempt (OSC) on March 10, 2026. It was served by mail on April 15, 2026, it was also personally served the same day.

The parties are ordered to appear for the arraignment.

TENTATIVE RULING #8: THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR FOR THE ARRAIGNMENT.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share