GABRIEL GIAMANCO V. MONIFA GIAMANCO
Order to Show Cause and Affidavit for Contempt (OSC)
Motion type
Causes of action
Parties
Ruling
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 April 23, 2026 8:30 AM/1:30 PM
7. GABRIEL GIAMANCO V. MONIFA GIAMANCO PFL20210240
On January 27, 2026, Petitioner filed an Order to Show Cause and Affidavit for Contempt (OSC) alleging 15 violations of custody orders. Respondent was personally served on February 24, 2026. Minor’s Counsel was not served.
This matter is dropped from calendar due to lack of proper service as Minor’s Counsel was not served. All parties to the action are to be served with requests filed with the court.
TENTATIVE RULING #7: THIS MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR DUE TO LACK OF PROPER SERVICE AS MINOR’S COUNSEL WAS NOT SERVED. ALL PARTIES TO THE ACTION ARE TO BE SERVED WITH REQUESTS FILED WITH THE COURT.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”