DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25FL0382·eldorado·Civil·Custody / Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Hearing 2 months agoCCRC agreement adopted.

BRANDON TUCK V. KODIE MONTOYA

Review hearing

Hearing date
Jun 11, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBRANDON TUCK
RespondentKODIE MONTOYA

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 June 11, 2026 8:30 AM/1:30 PM

20. BRANDON TUCK V. KODIE MONTOYA 25FL0382

Parties appeared in Department 8 for a Domestic Violence Restraining Order hearing on March 12, 2026. The court referred the parties to Child Custody Recommending Counseling (CCRC) with an appointment on April 8, 2026, and a review hearing on June 11, 2026, in Department 5.

Both parties attended CCRC on April 8th and reached a full agreement. A report memorializing the parties’ agreement was filed with the court on May 20, 2026, and mailed to the parties on May 21st.

The court has read and considered the parties’ agreement and finds it to be in the best interests of the minors. The court adopts the agreement as set forth in the May 20th CCRC report.

All prior orders not in conflict with this order remain in full force and effect. Petitioner is directed to prepare the Findings and Orders After Hearing (FOAH); however, this order is effective immediately upon the court’s adoption of the tentative ruling and is not conditioned on the preparation of the FOAH.

TENTATIVE RULING #20: THE COURT ADOPTS THE PARTIES’ AGREEMENT AS SET FORTH IN THE MAY 20TH CCRC REPORT. ALL PRIOR ORDERS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDER REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. PETITIONER IS DIRECTED TO PREPARE THE FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER HEARING (FOAH); HOWEVER, THIS ORDER IS EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY UPON THE COURT’S ADOPTION OF THE TENTATIVE RULING AND IS NOT CONDITIONED ON THE PREPARATION OF THE FOAH.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share