DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25FL0708·eldorado·Civil·Domestic Violence / Custody
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED; Order to Appear for evidentiary hearing

Crystal Renee Stuck v. Dustin Elliot Stuck

Review hearing

Hearing date
May 21, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCrystal Renee Stuck
DefendantDustin Elliot Stuck

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 May 21, 2026 8:30 AM/1:30 PM

9. CRYSTAL RENEE STUCK V. DUSTIN ELLIOT STUCK 25FL0708

On February 25, 2026, the parties appeared before the court in Department 8 for hearing on the Request for Domestic Violence Restraining Order filed by Petitioner. The parties stipulated to a two year restraining order with Respondent and the minor as protected parties. The parties were referred to Child Custody Recommending Counseling (CCRC) for custody and visitation orders and a review hearing was set for the present date.

Respondent filed a supplemental declaration on May 7th, it was served on May 6th.

The parties attended CCRC on April 2, 2026. The parties were unable to reach any agreements, therefore a report with recommendations was prepared on May 6, 2026, and another on May 12, 2026, it was mailed to the parties on May 13th.

On May 14th, Respondent filed an Objection to Petitioner’s Supplemental Declaration Signed 5/13/26. It was served on the 14th.

Petitioner filed an objection to the CCRC report on May 18th. It was served on the 17th.

The parties are ordered to appear to select dates for an evidentiary hearing.

TENTATIVE RULING #9: THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR TO SELECT DATES FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share