JACINTA LASHAE BADELITA V. BOGDANEL BADELITA
Request for Order seeking travel orders
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 June 11, 2026 8:30 AM/1:30 PM
12. JACINTA LASHAE BADELITA V. BOGDANEL BADELITA 22FL0797
On January 22, 2026, Respondent filed a Request for Order (RFO) seeking orders to travel to Romania. It was served the same day; however, Respondent did not serve the requisite blank FL-320 or the Notice of Tentative Ruling as required.
Parties appeared for the hearing on April 9, 2026, at which time Respondent requested the matter be continued to allow additional time to perfect service.
Upon review of the court file, there is no new Proof of Service showing Petitioner was properly served.
This matter is dropped from calendar due to lack of proper service.
TENTATIVE RULING #12: THIS MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR DUE TO LACK OF PROPER SERVICE.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”