DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24FL0018·eldorado·Civil·Family Law - Support/DVRO
Hearing 4 months agoDropped from calendar due to lack of proper service.

Jessica Rubalcava v. Isaiah Rubalcava

Request for Order (RFO)

Hearing date
Apr 16, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJessica Rubalcava
DefendantIsaiah Rubalcava

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 April 16, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.

19. JESSICA RUBALCAVA V. ISAIAH RUBALCAVA 24FL0018

Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) on February 18, 2026, requesting spousal support as well as modification of the Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO). Petitioner filed an Income and Expense Declaration on February 13, 2026. There is no Proof of Service showing Respondent was properly served.

Respondent filed a Responsive Declaration on April 2, 2026. Proof of Service shows Petitioner was served electronically on April 6, 2026. Respondent asserts he was not properly served.

The court drops the matter from calendar due to the lack of proper service.

All prior orders remain in full force and effect.

TENTATIVE RULING #19: THE MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR DUE TO THE LACK OF PROPER SERVICE. ALL PRIOR ORDERS REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share