Bryan Chaix v. Kristina Neidiger
Request for Order (RFO)
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 April 16, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.
2. BRYAN CHAIX V. KRISTINA NEIDIGER PFL20200265
Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) on December 16, 2025, seeking orders from the court to enter the judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 664.6 and reimbursement for overpayment of support. Respondent was served electronically on December 23, 2025. The court notes the Proof of Service does not show Respondent was served with the Notice of Tentative Ruling.
Respondent filed a Responsive Declaration on February 2, 2026. It was served electronically on February 2nd. Respondent consents in part to Petitioner’s request and objects in part to the requests.
Petitioner filed a Reply Declaration on February 6, 2026. It was served electronically the same day.
The matter was originally scheduled for hearing on February 19, 2026. The parties asked for a continuance, which was granted, and the hearing was continued to the present date.
On March 4, 2026, Petitioner filed and served a declaration.
The court finds there has not been a meeting of the minds of the parties as to the terms of the judgment. As such, the court is not entering the judgment pursuant to 664.6.
The parties are ordered to appear for the hearing.
TENTATIVE RULING #2: PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR FOR THE HEARING.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”