DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PFL20180042·eldorado·Civil·Child Custody/Parenting Plan Modification
Hearing 4 months agoDENIED

Kayla Stabile v. Sean Stabile

Request for Order (RFO) for modification

Hearing date
Apr 30, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKayla Stabile
DefendantSean Stabile

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 April 30, 2026 8:30 AM/1:30 PM

21. KAYLA STABILE V. SEAN STABILE PFL20180042

Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) on January 30, 2026, seeking modification of the current child custody and parenting plan orders. The parties were referred to Child Custody Recommending Counseling (CCRC) with an appointment on March 2, 2026, and a review hearing on April 30, 2026. Proof of Service shows Respondent was personally served on February 1, 2026.

Only Respondent appeared at the CCRC appointment. As such, a single parent report was filed with the court on April 20, 2026. Copies were mailed to the parties the same day.

The court denies Petitioner’s request for modification due to her failure to appear at the CCRC appointment.

All prior orders remain in full force and effect. Petitioner is directed to prepare the Findings and Orders After Hearing (FOAH); however, this order is effective immediately upon the court’s adoption of the tentative ruling and is not conditioned on the preparation of the FOAH.

TENTATIVE RULING #21: PETITIONER’S REQUEST TO MODIFY THE CURRENT CUSTODY AND PARENTING PLAN ORDERS IS DENIED DUE TO PETITIONER'S FAILURE TO APPEAR AT CCRC. ALL PRIOR ORDERS REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. PETITIONER IS DIRECTED TO PREPARE THE FINDINGS AND ORDERS AFTER HEARING (FOAH); HOWEVER, THIS ORDER IS EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY UPON THE COURT’S ADOPTION OF THE TENTATIVE RULING AND IS NOT CONDITIONED ON THE PREPARATION OF THE FOAH.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share