| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Date |
|---|
Motion to Compel Discovery; Request for Attorney Fees
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 SCOTT LAUGHLIN,) Case Number: FDI-24-800678) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: April 23, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 CAROLINE SELLKE,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, A.AN ORDER COMBELLING 13 RESPONDENT (WIFE) TO SUPPLEMENT HER RESPONSE AND DOCUMENTS TO 14 PETITIONER'S (HUSBAND'S) "DEMANDING FOR IDENTIFICATION, PRODUCTION AND 15 INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET NO. ONE " REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS, SET NO ONE," 16 AND "FORM INTERROGATORIES - GENERAL. SET NO ONE" AND B. ATTORNEY'S FEES IN 17 THE AMOUNT OF $12000, PAYABLE BY WIFE AS A SANCTION PURSUANT TO CODE OF 18 CIVIL PROCEDURE 19 TENTATIVE RULING 20 On the Court’s own motion, this matter is continued to 6/5/26 at 1:30 PM in Dept 405(A) to be heard on 21 the Court’s family law discovery calendar. The hearing will take place in room 403. No appearances are 22 required on 4/23/26. 23
27
29
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.