DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23610891·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED to May 27, 2026 in department 301

SARAH LEWIS VS. KENNETH RUNYON ET AL

Motion To Compel Further Responses To Plaintiffs Responses To Special Interrogatories, Set Two

Hearing date
May 19, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 27, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSARAH LEWIS
DefendantKENNETH RUNYON
DefendantLUIS MAGALLON

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23610891 - May 19, 2026 Hearing date: May 19, 2026 Case number: CGC23610891 Case title: SARAH LEWIS VS. KENNETH RUNYON ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23610891 | Case Title: | | SARAH LEWIS VS. KENNETH RUNYON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-05-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Compel Further Responses To Plaintiffs Responses To Special Interrogatories, Set Two | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 19, 2026. Line 4.1.

DEFENDANT LUIS MAGALLON Motion To Compel Further Responses To Plaintiffs Responses To Special Interrogatories, Set Two is CONTINUED to May 27, 2026 in department 301.

Discovery motions in general civil actions are heard in departments 301 (odd numbered cases) and department 302 (even numbered cases). =(501/DWH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share