Motions to Deem Admitted; Motions to Compel Further Responses
ruling, please follow the instructions provided above. On May 28, 2025, Plaintiff Antonyan Vardan filed the operative Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") asserting 24 causes of action. Plaintiff alleges that after he objected to an unpermitted gate, Defendant "Kazamel orchestrated a retaliatory and procedurally invalid vote to remove him [from the HOA board]. That marked the beginning of a targeted effort to silence and eliminate Plaintiff. Over the following years, he faced illegal vehicle tows, wage garnishment, perjured testimony in court, denial of HOA election rights, and mass defamatory communications--all designed to isolate him socially and professionally.
Coordinated actions by HOA members, attorneys, and vendors--under Kazamel's leadership-- culminated in Plaintiff's job loss, failed businesses, and personal bankruptcy in 2025." Plaintiff now seeks to compel further responses to his requests for production, set three, from Defendant Kriger & Schuber, APC. The Motion is denied because a separate statement was not provided. Additionally, it appears Plaintiff improperly seeks discovery that the Court previously found Plaintiff to have forfeited via a late motion to compel.
Plaintiff is sanctioned $500, payable within 30 days. Moving party to give notice.
Judge Kevin C. Brazile Department 20 Hearing Date: August 14, 2026 Case Name: Anwar v. AC General Construction, et al. Case No.: 25STCV10349 Matter: (1) Motions to Deem Admitted (2x) (2) Motions to Compel Further Responses (4x) Moving Party: Plaintiff Yasir Anwar Responding Party: Unopposed Ruling: The Motions are granted. Moving party to give notice. The Court encourages all parties to appear remotely via LA CourtConnect. If submitting on the Court's tentative ruling, please follow the instructions provided above.
Plaintiff Yasir Anwar, a pro per litigant, now seeks to deem his requests for admission ("RFAs"), set two, propounded on Itsy and Alfredo Castro admitted. Plaintiff also seeks to compel further responses to his special interrogatories ("SIs") and requests for production ("RFPs") form Itsy and Alfredo Castro. There are a total of 6 discovery motions at issue. Because responses have not apparently been provided, the Motions are granted. The RFAs are deemed admitted. For the RFPs and SIs, further responses without objections are to be provided within 30 days.
Defendants are sanctioned $360 in total, payable within 30 days. Moving party to give notice. | Home -->)" -->
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”