DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678365·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 4 months agoOFF CALENDAR

TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC VS. CHARLES BUTTS ET AL

Notice Of Motion For Entry Of Judgment

Hearing date
May 1, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC
DefendantCHARLES BUTTS

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for May 1, 2026. Line 8. PLAINTIFF TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC Notice Of Motion For Entry Of Judgment is OFF CALENDAR. Defendant is represented limited scope in this action, and there is no substitution of attorney or order relieving Defendant's limited scope counsel on file. All papers in this case must therefore be served on both the Defendant and the Defendant's limited scope attorney. (CRC 3.36.) Proof of service on file indicates notice of this motion and the accompanying papers were served on the Defendant only. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share