| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion To Adopt Value Pursuant To The Partition Of Real Property Act
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24620852 - April 21, 2026 Hearing date: April 21, 2026 Case number: CGC24620852 Case title: MARTHA SHEN-URQUIDEZ ET AL VS. LOUISA HU ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24620852 | Case Title: | | MARTHA SHEN-URQUIDEZ ET AL VS. LOUISA HU ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-04-21 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Adopt Value Pursuant To The Partition Of Real Property Act; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof; Declaration Of Maya Rhode | Rulings: | | On the Real Property/Housing Motion calendar for April 21, 2026, line 4.
Defendant's Motion to Adopt Value Pursuant to the Partition of Real Property Act is GRANTED as follows: moving party shall prepare a form of notice under CCP 874.316(e) and present it to the Court for execution at the hearing. Moving party to prepare a form of Notice of CCP 874.316(f) with a hearing date of June 5, 2026 and present it for execution to the Court at the hearing. No opposition filed. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”