DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC21591090·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 4 months agoGRANTED

NANCY FUNG VS. WHADOW INVESTMENTS LLC ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Exclude Time From Five Year Period Under Ccp Section 583.310 Pursuant To Ccp 583.340

Hearing date
Apr 10, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffNANCY FUNG
DefendantWHADOW INVESTMENTS LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC21591090 - April 10, 2026 Hearing date: April 10, 2026 Case number: CGC21591090 Case title: NANCY FUNG VS. WHADOW INVESTMENTS LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC21591090 | Case Title: | | NANCY FUNG VS. WHADOW INVESTMENTS LLC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-04-10 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Exclude Time From Five Year Period Under Ccp Section 583.310 Pursuant To Ccp 583.340 | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 10, 2026. Line 2.

PLAINTIFF NANCY FUNG, AS TRUSTEE OF THE FOOK BING FUNG AND LIN CHIU FUNG REVOCABLE TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 11, 1998 Notice Of Motion And Motion To Exclude Time From Five Year Period Under Ccp Section 583.310 Pursuant To Ccp 583.340 is GRANTED as follows: the 5 years period starts running on September 4, 2024 at the time of the filing of the First Amended Complaint. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share