Sandlin vs. Prime Healthcare Anaheim, LLC

Defendants have shown they were reasonably incurred. (See Code of Civ. Proc. § 1033.5, subd. (a)(11),(13), § 998, subd. (c)(1); see also Sahagun Decl. ¶¶ 62-145.) Plaintiff failed to meet her burden showing the costs were unreasonable or unnecessary.

Defendants shall give notice.

306 Sandlin vs. Before the Court is an unopposed motion to compel Prime arbitration filed by defendant Prime Healthcare Healthcare Anaheim LLC (Defendant) as to the Complaint filed Anaheim, LLC by plaintiff Charles Sandlin.

Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.2.) Defendant met its burden to show a written arbitration agreement exists that covers plaintiff’s claims. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.2; Rosenthal v. Great Western Fin. Securities Corp. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 394, 413; see also Robinson Decl., ¶4 & Exhs. A, B.) Moreover, in response to the motion Plaintiff states that he “consents to an Order compelling the parties to arbitration and stay this civil action pending the outcome of that arbitration.” (ROA 30.)

Plaintiff Charles Sandlin shall submit his claims against Defendant to binding arbitration pursuant to their agreement as set forth in Exhibits A & B to the declaration of Vanessa Labasan-Robinson.

This action is stayed pending completion of arbitration. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.4.)

The 8/10/26 CMC is vacated. The court sets a status conference re binding arbitration for February 8, 2027 at 8:45 a.m. in Dept. C24.

Defendant shall give notice.