DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CPF26519538·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 5 months agoCONTINUED

SARAH B. KINER VS. 2208 MISSION STREET OWNERS ASSOCIATION ET AL

Notice Of Petition To Confirm Final Arbitration Award, Including Damages And Attorney Fees And Costs

Hearing date
Mar 18, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Apr 21, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerSARAH KINER
Respondent2208 MISSION STREET OWNERS ASSOCIATION

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CPF26519538 - March 18, 2026 Hearing date: March 18, 2026 Case number: CPF26519538 Case title: SARAH B. KINER VS. 2208 MISSION STREET OWNERS ASSOCIATION ET AL Case Number: | | CPF26519538 | Case Title: | | SARAH B. KINER VS. 2208 MISSION STREET OWNERS ASSOCIATION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-18 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Petition To Confirm Final Arbitration Award, Including Damages And Attorney Fees And Costs | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 18, 2026. Line 10.

PETITIONER SARAH KINER Notice Of Petition To Confirm Final Arbitration Award, Including Damages And Attorney Fees And Costs is continued to April 21, 2026. Courtesy copy of opposition papers received on March 17, 2026. This is not enough time to review. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share