DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25623817·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 5 months agoOFF CALENDAR

LIDIA MARIBEL MENDEZ ET AL VS. ELENA CRUZ ET AL

MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

Hearing date
Mar 18, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLIDIA MARIBEL MENDEZ
DefendantELENA CRUZ

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25623817 - March 18, 2026 Hearing date: March 18, 2026 Case number: CGC25623817 Case title: LIDIA MARIBEL MENDEZ ET AL VS. ELENA CRUZ ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25623817 | Case Title: | | LIDIA MARIBEL MENDEZ ET AL VS. ELENA CRUZ ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-18 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 18, 2026. Line 4.1. PLAINTIFF LIDIA MENDEZ AN INDIVIDUAL MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD is OFF CALENDAR.

No proof of service on Defense counsel on file. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share