DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682125·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing about 2 months agoOFF CALENDAR

BRICK & TIMBER, INC. VS. NESTOR BRITO PONCE ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jul 22, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBRICK & TIMBER, INC.
DefendantNESTOR BRITO PONCE

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682125 - July 22, 2026 Hearing date: July 22, 2026 Case number: CUD26682125 Case title: BRICK & TIMBER, INC. VS. NESTOR BRITO PONCE ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26682125 | Case Title: | | BRICK & TIMBER, INC. VS. NESTOR BRITO PONCE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-22 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 22, 2026. Line 17. DEFENDANT MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT is OFF CALENDAR per the request of the moving party. =(501/CCH) Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom (Meeting ID: 160 1140 0818 Passcode: 976491).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share