Expedited Petition to Compromise Claim of Minor
(34) Tentative Ruling
Re: In re Diego Bedolla Superior Court Case No. 26CECG01379
Hearing Date: August 6, 2026 (Dept. 403)
Motion: Expedited Petition to Compromise Claim of Minor
Tentative Ruling:
To deny the petition, without prejudice, for the reasons explained below. Petitioner must file an amended petition, with appropriate supporting papers and proposed orders.
In the event that oral argument is requested the minor is excused from appearing.
Explanation:
According to the petition, the minor has fully recovered from injuries received in a car collision and is to receive a gross settlement of $15,000 with the balance of the settlement after medical costs and attorney fees to be deposited in a blocked account.
The Petition at Item 9a indicates that the minor has recovered completely from his injuries. Counsel has provided a supplemental declaration and includes a recent medical record dated July 27, 2026 indicating the minor is continuing to experience headaches and dizziness. (Yahoudai Decl., Ex. 1.) This additional evidence does not support the Petition’s representation that the injuries have resolved. Counsel in his declaration urges the court to approve the petition on the basis that the policy limits have been tendered and regardless of the status of the minor’s injuries there is no additional money to be recovered. (Id., ¶¶ 3, 6.)
The court understands the reality of the exhaustion of policy limits limiting the recovery for the injuries. However, this does not excuse the inconsistencies between the representation in the petition that the minor has recovered from his injuries and the evidence indicating he has not. If the minor’s injuries have not resolved the Petition should reflect this condition and whether the residual headaches and dizziness are expected to be temporary or permanent.
As a result of these inconsistencies, the petition is denied, without prejudice.
Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.
Tentative Ruling
Issued By: SMC on August 5, 2026. (Judge’s initials) (Date) 5
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”