DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CU00752·fresno·Probate·Probate
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED

In the Matter of Gomez

Expedited Petition to Compromise Claim of Minor

Hearing date
Jun 2, 2026
Department
502
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$15,000$432.80

Parties

PetitionerGomez

Ruling

(37) Intended Ruling

Re: In the Matter of Gomez Superior Court Case No. 26CU00752

Hearing Date: June 2, 2026 (Dept. 502)

Motion: Expedited Petition to Compromise Claim of Minor

Tentative Ruling:

To deny the petition, without prejudice, for the reasons explained below. In the event that oral argument is requested the minor is excused from appearing.

Explanation:

As identified in the Intended Ruling issued May 22, 2026, according to the petition, the minor has fully recovered from injuries including bilateral ear pain, neck pain, and lower back pain received in a car collision on January 16, 2025. The minor is to receive a gross settlement of $15,000 with the balance of the settlement after attorney fees and litigation costs to be deposited in a blocked account. There are several issues with the petition that prevent approval.

The Petition indicates that the balance will be deposited into a blocked account. Petitioner failed to include Attachment 19b(2) to identify where these funds will be deposited.

The Petition at Item 9a indicates that the minor has recovered completely from her injuries, however, the most recent doctor’s report, from December 17, 2025, indicates the minor is still experiencing bilateral ear pain and moderate neck and back pain. Dr. Roofian advised follow up for the ear pain with an ear, nose, and throat specialist. There is no indication of any further treatment or that the ear pain resolved. There is no declaration from the petitioner confirming the minor’s injuries resolved without further treatment or a well-child visit with her regular doctor dated after December 17, 2025.

The Petition requests expenses in the amount of $432.80. Counsel generally claims these fees include fees for obtaining medical records and billing, document preparation, postage and delivery expenses, telephone and communication expenses, and administrative costs. No itemized statement was provided. The court does not intend to approve charges against the minor’s recovery that are unreasonable. (Prob. Code, § 3601.)

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order

adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Tentative Ruling

Issued By: KCK on 06/01/26. (Judge’s initials) (Date)

6

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share