Signature Collection Properties, LLC vs. Academy West Investments, LLC

Trust vs. JMI Trading Inc. 2026-01570438 11. Signature Collection Properties, LLC vs. Academy West Investments, LLC 2021-01206266 OFF CALENDAR based on notice of withdrawal of motion filed on July 27, 2026.

12. Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC vs. Manukyan 2011-00457348 Before the court is the motion to vacate the judgment defendant Larisa Manukyan (Defendant) filed on June 4, 2026. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 683.170, Defendant seeks to vacate the renewed judgment entered on April 1, 2021, which renewed the default judgment entered against Defendant and in favor of plaintiff Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC (Plaintiff) on June 23, 2011. As more fully set forth below, the motion is DENIED.

First, the motion is untimely. On this motion, Defendant bears the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that she is entitled to vacate the renewal of judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 683.170. (American Contractors Indemnity Co. v. Hernandez (2022) 73 Cal.App.5th 845, 848.) Based on the evidence presented, Defendant has not met that burden.

Defendant asserts she never received the notice of renewal Plaintiff filed on April 8, 2021, and claims to have served on Defendant on April 14, 2021. (ROA 36, Manukyan Decl., ¶ 13.) On April 6, 2026, Plaintiff filed a proof of service showing it mailed the application for and now of renewal of judgment to Defendant at an address on Cypress Street in Glendale, California on April 14, 2021. On or about April 6, 2026, Plaintiff also filed on the Los Angeles Superior Court action a declaration by the person who mailed the notice of renewal to Defendant confirm that mailing. (ROA 34, Ex. F; ROA 40.)

Defendant does not dispute the Cypress Street address to which the notice of renewal was sent is her address and has been since December 2016 as she confirmed in the identify theft affidavit he presented to the Glendale Police Department and attached to her opposition. Instead, Defendant simply offers her own declaration denying receipt of the notice of and application for renewal of judgment. As stated, Plaintiff has offered a proof of service