DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25680751·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 5 months agoOFF CALENDAR per request of the moving party.

SFHA HOUSING CORPORATION VS. JANET ROSMARY PAUCAS CAMARGO ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Mar 10, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSFHA HOUSING CORPORATION
DefendantJANET ROSMARY PAUCAS CAMARGO
DefendantJUAN OCHOA

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680751 - March 10, 2026 Hearing date: March 10, 2026 Case number: CUD25680751 Case title: SFHA HOUSING CORPORATION VS. JANET ROSMARY PAUCAS CAMARGO ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680751 | Case Title: | | SFHA HOUSING CORPORATION VS. JANET ROSMARY PAUCAS CAMARGO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-10 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 10, 2026.

Line 4. DEFENDANT JANET ROSMARY PAUCAS CAMARGO, JUAN OCHOA DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT is OFF CALENDAR per request of the moving party. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share