DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25624213·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 11 months agoOFF CALENDAR. Re-noticed for October 3, 2025.

KORENE TOM VS. JUN MING YU ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Sep 29, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 3, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKORENE TOM
DefendantJUN MING YU

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25624213 - September 29, 2025 Hearing date: September 29, 2025 Case number: CGC25624213 Case title: KORENE TOM VS. JUN MING YU ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25624213 | Case Title: | | KORENE TOM VS. JUN MING YU ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-29 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court motion calendar for September 29, 2025, line 4. Defendants' Demurrer to Amended Complaint is OFF CALENDAR.

Re-noticed for October 3, 2025. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share