DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24620425·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 6 months agoDefendant's Motion Requiring Plaintiff to Post Undertaking is OFF CALENDAR.

BRYAN ACUNA VS. VERITAS INVESTMENTS, INC. ET AL

Notice Of Motion Requiring Plaintiff Bryan Acuna To Post Undertaking

Hearing date
Mar 3, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBRYAN ACUNA
DefendantVERITAS INVESTMENTS, INC.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24620425 - March 3, 2026 Hearing date: March 3, 2026 Case number: CGC24620425 Case title: BRYAN ACUNA VS. VERITAS INVESTMENTS, INC. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24620425 | Case Title: | | BRYAN ACUNA VS. VERITAS INVESTMENTS, INC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-03 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion Requiring Plaintiff Bryan Acuna To Post Undertaking | Rulings: | | Real Property / Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for March 3, 2026, line 2.

Defendant's Motion Requiring Plaintiff to Post Undertaking is OFF CALENDAR. Notice of withdrawal on file. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share