DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24676980·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 6 months agoOFF CALENDAR

JUN ZHANG VS. MARTIN LEE ENG ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Strike Fraudulent Calims Of Right To Possession And For Injunctive Relief

Hearing date
Feb 19, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJUN ZHANG
DefendantMARTIN LEE ENG
OtherGARDUNO

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24676980 - February 19, 2026 Hearing date: February 19, 2026 Case number: CUD24676980 Case title: JUN ZHANG VS. MARTIN LEE ENG ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24676980 | Case Title: | | JUN ZHANG VS. MARTIN LEE ENG ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Strike Fraudulent Calims Of Right To Possession And For Injunctive Relief; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Declaration Of Jun Zhang | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 19, 2026. Line 8. PLAINTIFF JUN ZHANG Motion To Strike Fraudulent Calims Of Right To Possession And For Injunctive Relief; is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice to Defendant Eng per CCP 1005(b) and 1010.6. No proof of service to Claimant Garduno. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share