DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24676980·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 7 months agoOFF CALENDAR

JUN ZHANG VS. MARTIN LEE ENG ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Hearing date
Jan 29, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJUN ZHANG
DefendantMARTIN LEE ENG

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24676980 - January 29, 2026 Hearing date: January 29, 2026 Case number: CUD24676980 Case title: JUN ZHANG VS. MARTIN LEE ENG ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24676980 | Case Title: | | JUN ZHANG VS. MARTIN LEE ENG ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-29 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 29, 2026. Line 7.

DEFENDANT MARTIN ENG MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is OFF CALENDAR. Moving papers must be served on each party who has appeared in this action. (CRC 1.21.) Proof of service indicates the moving papers were served only on the plaintiff, and not on either of the two prejudgment claimants. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share