DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25626616·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 7 months agoGRANTED with leave to amend

GRACE WAIKWAN WONG VS. SIMON PO WAI WONG ET AL

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

Hearing date
Jan 27, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffGRACE WAIKWAN WONG
DefendantSIMON PO WAI WONG

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25626616 - January 27, 2026 Hearing date: January 27, 2026 Case number: CGC25626616 Case title: GRACE WAIKWAN WONG VS. SIMON PO WAI WONG ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25626616 | Case Title: | | GRACE WAIKWAN WONG VS. SIMON PO WAI WONG ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-27 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 27, 2026. Line 4.2.

CROSS DEFENDANT GRACE WONG, ALSO KNOWN AS GRACE W.K. WONG, AN INDIVIDUAL AND TRUSTEE OF THE GRACE WAIKWAN WONG TRUST DATED JULY 24, 2024 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS is GRANTED with leave to amend for Cross-Complainants' to allege facts in good faith showing that the statute of limitations has not run on the causes of action for fraud and breach of contract. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share