Request for Supplemental Injunction
CASE NUMBER: 26CV-0210413 Tentative Ruling on Request for Supplemental Injunction: Plaintiff Charles Tomlinson seeks an injunction for the return or preservation of his vehicle alleged to be in the possession of Defendants, Dentz Customs & 9
Collision, Ryan Dale and Wendy Correa. No opposition has been filed. The proof of services for the “request” show service of a “proposed” supplemental injunction. It is unclear if the “proposed” documents served are the same as the documents filed with the Court. Additionally, the “proposed” supplemental injunction was served on May 26, 2026 but the current request was not filed until June 30, 2026. There is insufficient evidence to show that the Defendants were given notice of the current request and hearing date. The Court denies the motion due to lack of proper service.
Additionally, the request is unsupported by any evidence. No declaration was filed. The Court is without any evidence to find that the issuance of an injunction would be proper under the circumstances. The Court further notes that the request fails to provide any authority upon which it is based. In addition to the procedural defects noted above, the Court denies the motion on the merits due to lack of evidence and authority.
The motion is DENIED. A proposed order was lodged with the Court which will be modified to reflect the denial.
WESLEY VS. CITY OF REDDING, ET AL.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”