DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC22602776·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 7 months agoDENIED without prejudice.

TAMARA AVILA ALVARADO ET AL VS. SALVADOR C. TANDOC ET AL

Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling And Order To Show Cause

Hearing date
Jan 23, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTAMARA AVILA ALVARADO
PlaintiffRENE PEREZ
DefendantSALVADOR C. TANDOC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC22602776 - January 23, 2026 Hearing date: January 23, 2026 Case number: CGC22602776 Case title: TAMARA AVILA ALVARADO ET AL VS. SALVADOR C. TANDOC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC22602776 | Case Title: | | TAMARA AVILA ALVARADO ET AL VS. SALVADOR C. TANDOC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-23 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling And Order To Show Cause | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 23, 2026. Line 2.

PLAINTIFF TAMARA ALVARADO AN INDIVIDUAL, RENE PEREZ, RENE PEREZ Application For Order For Sale Of Dwelling And Order To Show Cause is DENIED without prejudice. Application is not supported by competent evidence. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share