DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23610891·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 7 months agoDENIED without prejudice.

SARAH LEWIS VS. KENNETH RUNYON ET AL

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File Third Amended Complaint; Motion To Seek Emotional-Distress And Punitive Damages Under Surviving Claims Based On Post-Sac Conduct

Hearing date
Jan 13, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSARAH LEWIS
DefendantKENNETH RUNYON

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Jan. 13, 2026. Line 1. PLAINTIFF SARAH LEWIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File Third Amended Complaint; Motion To Seek Emotional-Distress And Punitive Damages Under Surviving Claims Based On Post-Sac Conduct is DENIED without prejudice. Motion fails to comply with CRC 3.1324. Additionally, based on the nature of the proposed allegations, the motion should be a motion to file a supplemental complaint. Finally, notice of motion is not sufficient. The Court reviewed the motion on the merits in light of the substantive oppositions filed by the defendants. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share