DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FDI-25-801720·sf·FamilyLaw·Contempt Discharge
Hearing 2 months agoDISMISSED

KENT PENWELL v. REAGAN PENWELL

Request for Order re Motion to Discharge Contempt Motion

Hearing date
Jun 11, 2026
Department
403
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffKENT PENWELL
DefendantREAGAN PENWELL

Ruling

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 KENT PENWELL,) Case Number: FDI-25-801720) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: June 11, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 REAGAN PENWELL,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE MOTION TO DISCHARGE CONTEMPT MOTION FILED ON 1-23- 13 2026 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 16 Court makes the following findings and orders: 17 A. Procedural History 18 1) The parties are Petitioner Kent Penwell (Father) and Respondent Reagan Penwell (Mother).

They 19 share two minor children subject to this proceeding: Stella Grace Penwell (DOB: 2/2/15) and 20 Kent Ryan Penwell II (DOB: 10/5/16). 21 2) On 4/17/26, Father filed a Request for Order seeking to discharge the Order to Show Cause and 22 Affidavit for Contempt Mother filed on 1/23/26. 23 3) On 4/23/26, Father filed a Request for Dismissal without prejudice of his 4/17/26 Request for 24 Order seeking to discharge the Order to Show Cause and Affidavit for Contempt Mother filed on 25 1/23/26. 26 B.

Findings and Order 27 1) Father’s request for dismissal without prejudice of his 4/17/26 Request for Order seeking to 28 discharge the Order to Show Cause and Affidavit for Contempt Mother filed on 1/23/26 is 29 GRANTED.

1 2) Father’s 4/17/26 Request for Order seeking to discharge the Order to Show Cause and Affidavit 2 for Contempt Mother filed on 1/23/26 is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. 3 3) Counsel for Father shall prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 4 4) Preparation of Order: If you are directed by the court to prepare the order after hearing – within 5 10 calendar days of the hearing you must either: (a) Serve the proposed order to the other 6 party/counsel for approval, and follow the procedures set forth in CA Rules of Court, Rule 7 5.125(c), or (b) If the other party did not appear or the matter was uncontested, submit the 8 proposed order after hearing directly to the court. Failure to submit the order after hearing within 9 10 days may allow the other party to prepare a proposed order and submit it to the court in 10 accordance with CA Rules of Court, Rule 5.125(d). 11

15

19

23

27

29

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share