Second Amended Petition for Orders
Conservatorship of Liliana Cirigo Casas 25PR000116
REVIEW – 1ST YEAR
TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Co-Conservators are acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the matter is set for a Review – Biennial hearing in two years, on July 28, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.
Conservatorship of Rogelio Perez-Plancarte 25PR000117
REVIEW HEARING
TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Conservator is acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the matter is set for a Review – Biennial hearing in two years, on July 28, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.
Estate of Tera Scott 25PR000254
FIRST AND FINAL ACCOUNT AND REPORT OF EXECUTOR AND PETITION FOR ITS SETTLEMENT, AND PETITION FOR FINAL DISTRIBUTION, FOR ALLOWANCE OF COMPENSATION TO EXECUTOR AND ATTORNEY FOR ORDINARY SERVICES
TENTATIVE RULING: The petition is GRANTED, including fees as prayed. The November 25, 2026, Status Hearing Re: Final Distribution is VACATED.
In The Matter of Karen K. Carson Revocable Trust 26PR000040
SECOND AMENDED PETITION FOR ORDERS
TENTATIVE RULING: The matter is CONTINUED to August 4, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A.
There remains no sufficient proof of service of the Amended Petition and no proof of service of the Notice of Hearing in the Court’s file. (See Probate Code § 17203 [requiring 30 days’ notice of hearing on trust matters].) The Court notes that Petitioner filed a Proof of Service of the Amended Petition on July 13, 2026 (7/13 POS). However, the 7/13 POS does not provide proof that the Amended Petition was served on all persons listed in the Amended Petition as entitled to notice. (Compare id. with Amended Petition at 11:2.) Specifically, there is no proof of service of the Amended Petition on Ian Lowney, Colin Lowney, Maria Ramirez, Teresa 3
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Gonzalez-Ramirez, or Suesan [sic] Kelly Hunt. (See Amended Petition at 11:2.) Moreover, there remains no proof of service of Notice of the instant hearing. The Court lacks jurisdiction to rule on a matter that has not been properly noticed for hearing on the date in question. (See Diaz v. Prof. Community Management, Inc. (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 1190, 1204-05.)
In The Matter of The Marjorie L. Watson 2014 Revocable 26PR000111 Living Trust
VERIFIED PETITION FOR: 1. REMOVAL OF TRUSTEE; 2. APPOINTMENT OF SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE; 3. ACCOUNTING
APPEARANCE REQUIRED. The parties shall attend prepared to discuss whether any opposition is anticipated, whether the parties intend to submit on verified pleadings and affidavits (see Evangelho v. Presoto (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 615, 620), whether any discovery or other pre-hearing practice is anticipated, and whether the parties are willing to participate in informal settlement discussions or other alternative dispute resolution proceedings. Should any party desire an evidentiary hearing, the parties shall be prepared to provide the Court with an estimate for the length of the hearing, and to set the hearing on the Court’s calendar. Counsel are directed to meet and confer on the foregoing issues prior to the hearing.
Estate of George Glascock 26PR000132
PETITION FOR PROBATE OF WILL AND FOR LETTERS TESTAMENTARY AND AUTHORIZATION TO ADMINISTER UNDER THE INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES ACT
TENTATIVE RULING: The Petition is GRANTED. Richard S. Thomas is appointed as probate referee. The matter is set for a Status Hearing Re: Final Distribution on July 30, 2027, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A. The Status Hearing may be vacated or continued without appearances needed if, prior thereto, the personal representative files a petition for an order for final distribution or a report of status of administration pursuant to Probate Code section 12200. The clerk is directed to provide notice to the parties.
In The Matter of Elianna Alvarez 26PR000156
PETITION FOR ORDER AUTHORIZING COMPROMISE OF MINOR’S CLAIM (Pr.C. 3500 et seq.)
APPEARANCE REQUIRED. The papers are in order. However, there is no written attorney fee agreement in the file. Rather, Petitioner states that a true and correct copy of the agreement will be made available at the hearing. (Pet., Attachment 17a, Declaration of Hank G. Greenblatt, ¶ 5.) The Court requires a review of the agreement prior to granting a minor’s
4