DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PB-0033358·shasta·Probate·Trust Administration
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

IN RE: MILENEWICZ-PENTA LIVING TRUST

Petition to Appoint Successor Trustee

Hearing date
Jun 1, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 6, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 26PB-0033358 This matter is on calendar for hearing on a Petition to Appoint Successor Trustee. The matter has been properly noticed with proof of service on file. No objections have been raised.

The verification on page 4 of the Petition is unsigned. Probate Code Section 15660.5 states that the Public Administrator may be appointed as trustee if, among other things, “after reasonable inquiry, no other qualified person is willing to act as trustee.” The Petition fails to address whether an inquiry has been made and whether the Trustor’s siblings are qualified to act as trustee.

Additionally, Probate Code Section 15660.5 requires that “at the time of appointment and pursuant to the terms of the trust, the entire trust is then to be distributed outright.” Section 9 of the Trust provides that distribution to a minor beneficiary shall either be (1) held in trust for that minor beneficiary, or (2) paid to the parent, custodian, or guardian of that minor beneficiary. The Petition fails to address whether the trust is to be distributed outright or held in trust for the minors.

The Court will require a Guardian Ad Litem be appointed for the minor beneficiaries.

The matter is continued to Monday, July 6, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for further proceedings on the Petition to Appoint Successor Trustee. An amended Petition is required to be filed to address the issues raised above. Petitioner is also required to file and serve a new Notice of Hearing for the continued hearing date, along with a copy of the amended Petition, on all parties entitled to notice. A Guardian Ad Litem is required to be appointed for the minor beneficiaries. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

IN RE: THE YERGENSON FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST OF 2001, DATED AUGUST 30, 2001

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share