MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682635 - July 29, 2026 Hearing date: July 29, 2026 Case number: CUD26682635 Case title: JOANNE LUU ET AL VS. BAILEY ASHA ALEXIOUS-SLATER ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26682635 | Case Title: | | JOANNE LUU ET AL VS. BAILEY ASHA ALEXIOUS-SLATER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-29 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 29, 2026. Line 12. Defendant's Motion to Quash Service of Summons. Hearing Required.
No later than 9:00 a.m. on July 29, 2026, defendant is ordered to produce a copy of the interior and exterior of the Ring video from 7:50 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on June 25, 2026. The video shall be delivered to Department 501. Defendant and Eric Montoya to be present at the hearing in-person or via Zoom with video capability.
This matter will be heard in department 318 by the Honorable Christopher C. Hite at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. This matter will be heard in department 318 by the Honorable Christopher C. Hite at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge.=(318/CCH) Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom (Meeting ID: 160 1140 0818 Passcode: 976491).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”