DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24619217·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 1 year agoOFF CALENDAR

JULIE SWAN ET AL VS. ABACUS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ET AL

Motion to Quash Service of Summons or Stay or Dismiss

Hearing date
Aug 8, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJULIE SWAN
DefendantABACUS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24619217 - August 8, 2025 Hearing date: August 8, 2025 Case number: CGC24619217 Case title: JULIE SWAN ET AL VS. ABACUS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24619217 | Case Title: | | JULIE SWAN ET AL VS. ABACUS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-08 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for August 8, 2025, line 6.

Defendant's Motion to Quash Service of Summons or Stay or Dismiss is OFF CALENDAR. The motion to quash is untimely. A motion to quash must be made "on or before the last day of his or her time to plead." (C.C.P. Section 418.10(a)). A Defendant's last day to plead is 30 days after service is deemed complete, and Defendant Abacus was served with the Summons and FAC on February 10, 2025. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share