Ex Parte Application for an Order Shortening Time to File Motion to Quash
26CV185158: LINDSEY MORRIS, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED vs BOSE CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION 07/29/2026 Hearing on Ex Parte Application for an Order Shortening Time to File Motion to Quash CRS# A-185158-001 in Department 18
Tentative Ruling - 07/28/2026 Patrick McKinney
Specially appearing Defendant Darden Corporation's Ex Parte Application to Advance the Hearing on its Motion to Quash Service of Summons is DENIED and September 2, 2026 hearing date is maintained. Scheduling a hearing date beyond 30 days after filing the notice of motion for a motion quash does not deprive the court of jurisdiction to hear the motion. (Preciado v. Freightliner Custom Chassis Corp. (2023) 87 Cal.App.5th 964, 969 fn.4.)
Oliver Moody Kiefer (Attorney) representing BOSE CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation (Defendant) must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and selfrepresented parties, and file proof of service. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.
CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING: If the parties do not contest the tentative ruling, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must notify the court by email at Dept18@alameda.courts.ca.gov, and notify all opposing counsel or unrepresented parties by 4pm the day before the hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”