MOTION TO DEEM REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS ADMITTED AND OF NONAPPEARANCE
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
July 28, 2026 Law and Motion Calendar PAGE 25 Judge: HONORABLE NANCY L. FINEMAN, Department 04 ________________________________________________________________________
2:00 PM LINE 10 26-CLJ-00102 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. VS FIDEL SIFUENTES
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ANTHONY LIO FIDEL SIFUENTES PRO SE
MOTION TO DEEM REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS ADMITTED AND OF NONAPPEARANCE
TENTATIVE RULING:
The court GRANTS plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank’s unopposed motion to deem facts admitted against defendant Fidel Sifuentes.
On February 19, 2026, plaintiff served by mail defendant with requests for admissions. (Declaration of Kirean D. McKee, Ex. A.) More than thirty-five days have passed and there have been no responses. Accordingly, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.420, the court deems the requests admitted. Plaintiff shall attach the requests for admission to the proposed order.
Plaintiff did not request sanctions and thus none are awarded.
Plaintiff states in its papers that it submits on the moving papers.
If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the court. Thereafter, counsel for plaintiff shall prepare a written order consistent with the court’s ruling for the court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312, and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in the action, as required by law and the California Rules of Court.
POSTED: 3:00 PM
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”