ZIJING LIU VS. STEPHEN F. POWELL

July 27, 2026 LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR PAGE 13 Judge: HONORABLE DAVID A. SILBERMAN, DEPARTMENT 11 ________________________________________________________________________

02:00 PM 26-UDL-00636 ZIJING LIU VS. STEPHEN F. POWELL LINE 9

ZIJING LIU PRO PER STEPHEN F. POWELL PRO PER

DEFENDANT STEPHEN POWELL’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT/JUDGMENT

TENTATIVE RULING:

The Motion to Set Aside the Default Judgment by Defendant Stephen F. Powell (“Defendant”) is DENIED. Defendant failed to file a proof of service with this Motion showing he properly served Plaintiff. Defendant’s Motion also fails to comply with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1112(a), because it does not include a notice of hearing for the Motion and a memorandum. Even if the construed Defendant’s “Motion” as a memorandum, Defendant fails to cite any legal authority pursuant to which he seeks relief. (See Cal.

Rules of Court, rule 3.1113(b) [“The memorandum must contain a statement of facts, a concise statement of the law, evidence and arguments relied on, and a discussion of the statutes, cases, and textbooks cited in support of the position advanced.”].) It appears Defendant may be seeking relief under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b), but if so, Defendant has not provided a copy of his proposed answer as required. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b).). He also fails to provide sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption he was properly served.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must email Dept.11@sanmateocourt.org with a copy to all other parties by 4:00 p.m. stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court. Thereafter, counsel for the prevailing party shall prepare for the Court’s signature a written order consistent with the Court’s ruling pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312